UCS Slave I #75060 VS UCS Executer SSD #10221
BlockTalk Summary
The LEGO community is discussing the investment potential of two iconic Ultimate Collector Series (UCS) sets: the Slave I (set 75060) and the Super Star Destroyer (SSD) Executor (set 10221). The original poster is seeking advice on which set is likely to appreciate more in value, considering factors like box condition and potential issues with the Slave I's older red bricks.
The original poster acquired both sets sealed at a mid-market price. The Super Star Destroyer's box condition is less than ideal, while the Slave I's box is in better shape. A key concern raised is the Slave I's use of brittle red pieces, a known issue in LEGO sets from the time of its production in 2015. The poster acknowledges that paying the current market value isn't ideal but is the reality of the situation.
The discussion centers on which set presents a better investment opportunity for long-term growth. The Slave I, with its iconic design and potential for future demand, is pitted against the Super Star Destroyer, a massive and impressive model. The condition of the boxes and the potential for brick degradation in the Slave I are important factors to consider when evaluating the investment potential.
For collectors looking to preserve their sets, a LEGO display case might be a worthwhile investment.
Hey Fellow Lego investors, I recently got the opportunity to acquire one of these 2 sets sealed for mid market price and I’m very interested which of these sets will have the best growth vs the initial investment value. (And which one is an objectively better investment in my collection) note to you the reader is that the box condition isn’t amazing on the SSD and the Slave I is in somewhat better condition box wise. I’m also concerned about the fact that the slave I used brittle red pieces...
Read the Full Article
This is a summary. Read the complete story at r/legoinvesting.
